Top Popular News Today
Read more :
Supreme Court Invalidates Key Part of Voting Rights Act
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday grief-stricken a core part of the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act and challenged House of representatives to come up with a replacement plot to protect blacks and other minorities in places where discrimination still
[compiling] more than 15,000 pages" of evidence for the governmental record, and passed Voting Rights Act reauthorization by lopsided bipartisan majorities of 98-0 in the Senate and 390-33 in the House? No, apparently, it's a
The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts, held that Section 4 of The Voting Rights Act was unconstitutional. Copy of opinion and breakdown.
The choice in Shelby County v. Holder revolves around Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act, which establishes a "coverage formula" to determine which states and local governments fall under Section 5, and therefore need to get approval before changing
[compiling] more than 15,000 pages" of evidence for the governmental record, and passed Voting Rights Act reauthorization by lopsided bipartisan majorities of 98-0 in the Senate and 390-33 in the House? No, apparently, it's a
No comments:
Post a Comment