Lance Armstrong and the art of lying

After more than a decade of vehement denials, Lance Armstrong finally came clean last night in an interview with Oprah Winfrey about his use of performance enhancing drugs. Early reviews leaned negative: Forbes said

The former chief of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency says a representative of Lance Armstrong's offered the agency a donation in the range of $200,000 to $250,000 in 2004 and the agency immediately rejected it. Terry Madden, who led USADA from 2000-07,

The former chief of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency says a representative of Lance Armstrong's offered the agency a donation in the range of $200,000 to $250,000 in 2004 and the agency immediately rejected it. Terry Madden, who led USADA from 2000-07,

Saturday Night Live's first show of 2013 opened with Piers Morgan, or as you know me, the British Mario Lopez and an all-star slate of guests, covering all the largest scandals of the week. Morgan introduced the recently

I've permanently believed Lance Armstrong and currently that he's come clean, I reckon he might be lying. We're in a world of shadows here, like a excellent spy novel — reckon John le Carré — where nothing is as it seems. And as in those novels, deception is not

Related Outdoor Links

• What Made Lance Armstrong Finally Crack in His Interview With …
• Lance Armstrong Blew His Last Chance, Experts Say – Advertising Age
• Jeff Tomczek: Lance Armstrong's Livestrong: An Extension of Ego

Lance Armstrong and the art of lying